arrow down
Featured Post

Why Should I Hire An Experienced Eminent Domain Attorney?

Anyone who receives notice that their property is threatened by eminent domain action should consult with an attorney who is very experienced in eminent domain law. Unfortunately, too many people obtain poor results after failing to hire an eminent domain attorney.

September 15th, 2025 | by Mike Faherty

Contingent Fees

September 4th, 2025 | by Mike Faherty

Self Representation is Risky

August 25th, 2025 | by Mike Faherty

10 Common False Beliefs About Eminent Domain

July 24th, 2025 | by Mike Faherty

Pennsylvania Eminent Domain Law Basics

July 14th, 2025 | by Mike Faherty

Eminent Domain Attorneys

June 2nd, 2025 | by Adam Klein

Professional Fee Reimbursement by PennDOT

One of the first things that Penn DOT will do when they approach a landowner in an eminent domain case is say that they, themselves, have commissioned an appraisal that has set the value of the property, and that the landowner should settle for that amount.

April 7th, 2025 | by Anthony Corby

Pennsylvania Senate Bill 225: A Step Forward in Eminent Domain Compensation

On February 3, 2021, the Supreme Court of the United States granted review of the September 10, 2019 Third Circuit Court of Appeals decision which held that New Jersey is entitled to immunity from condemnation suits initiated by PennEast Pipeline Company for the purpose of building a 120-mile pipeline from Luzerne County, Pennsylvania to Mercer County, New Jersey.

September 23rd, 2021 | by Mike Faherty

The Sunoco Pipeline and Mariner East Pipelines continue to be controversial

The Sunoco Pipeline and Mariner East Pipelines continue to be controversial. The Flynn v. Sunoco Pipeline case resulted in an Order from Pennsylvania Public Utility Judge Elizabeth Barnes.

February 5th, 2021 | by Tara Horvath

U.S Supreme Court Reviews Property Rights Re The PennEast Pipeline

On February 3, 2021, the Supreme Court of the United States granted review of the September 10, 2019 Third Circuit Court of Appeals decision which held that New Jersey is entitled to immunity from condemnation suits initiated by PennEast Pipeline Company for the purpose of building a 120-mile pipeline from Luzerne County, Pennsylvania to Mercer County, New Jersey.